Dear Sir,
Re: DA545/2013
Beecroft Module Development
We wish to lodge our objection
to the proposed redevelopment of the Beecroft Module site as outlined in
DA545/2013. We consider the development is unacceptable in its present form for
the following reasons.
1.
The building is not in keeping with the heritage
nature of the Beecroft village in style and amenity. To allow loss of heritage
is a disservice and insult to the residents of Beecroft who are the rate payers
of the area. All councils have a responsibility to serve the wishes of the
residents of particular areas. There is no place for a “one size fits all”
attitude in any suburb.
2.
The building appears to be a “grab” for dwelling
space. 144 units are excessive by any measure in such a small space. This
should be halved. In addition there should be a variety of unit sizes to allow
equally for singles, families and retirees. This would fit with the diversity
of the suburb.
3.
Car exit and entry to the proposed building is
plainly inadequate and dangerous. This must be resolved to protect the many
pedestrians that frequent the village precinct be they aged (many), young (many
school aged), or family. The Hannah street frontage is steep, has poor vision
for drivers and is already crowded. The Beecroft Road frontage, whilst better,
has significant peak hour traffic jams.
4.
There is no allowance for the expected Village
Square and public access is unacceptably limited. Beecroft residents
consistently state they want a village atmosphere with comfortable open space
in keeping with the heritage and social composition of the suburb. This
building does not meet these essential criteria.
5.
As the village precinct is also a train and bus area,
commuters and shoppers are part of the day to day mixture. The building does
not provide for shelter from the weather along its frontages. This should be a
fundamental requirement.
6.
Current commuter parking in Beecroft is
inadequate. This building will exacerbate an already difficult situation. New
planning should overcome inadequacies not the opposite. There is a great danger
of loss of commuter parking adjacent to the station due to the third track that
State Rail is constructing. This must be allowed for in all building proposals
for the Beecroft Village precinct.
Yours sincerely, (etc)
No comments:
Post a Comment